What you see, I just finished watching it and actually Rasmus Hojlund is really bad at finishing. Until now I don't know what made Erik ten Hag want him so much as a Manchester United striker for next season. He is a little younger than Haaland and indeed for the long term a player like Rasmus Hojlund is what Manchester United needs the most, but if in one season or after there is no improvement in terms of finishing then it is certain that he will not be as mature as a great striker like Erling Haaland .
Do not follow football only through statistical numbers from Sofascore or similar. Also, journalists like to write spectacular things, so their analyzes must be bombastic rather than based on serious analysis.
ETH definitely changes the club policy of the type of players it brings, and if we look at those who came, they all came because of him and the legacy of the club. Most of them rejected equally lucrative offers because they wanted to work with ETH at Man United. Unlike, for example, Pogba, Sanchez, and Di Maria, now he brings players who want to play for the club. This is a significant difference and improvement in the transfer policy.
If we talk about player performance improvement, look at what ETH did with most of the inherited players in MU, they all made serious progress. So, are the doubts about the progress of the talented 20-year-old player really justified?
Why are Hojlund and Haaland persistently compared? Because of a similar last name?
I understand that it's not always good to follow what you say and often the numbers are manipulated. But if journalists do that, the name that is published will also become more famous, whether it's because of good or bad news. I really admit that Erik ten hag is capable of carrying out the tasks inherited from the previous coach and with the current squad he has been able to prove this since last season. Erik ten hag will continue to work to pursue his target of bringing Manchester United to the pinnacle of glory to win various titles including the EPL.
I don't doubt Rasmus Hojlund, it's just that at a cost of up to 70 million euros it seems too much but as long as he proves his quality later at Manchester United is equivalent to that money then of course it has paid off and is very well deserved. Hojlund and Haaland are compared because both are players from two clubs who have high rivalry with each other and I think that's natural because at any time the team's competition will continue to be aligned to the players' business. However, for more specific similarities, the two players use the same left foot, tall posture and are also Scandinavian.