What I'm trying to say is that, although (1) a user is eligible to be part of DT1 and (2) the system nominated him as DT1 (by the monthly reshuffle), then if he is cast out by the vote of majority (more exclusions than inclusions) then his voting powers should be also eliminated. Why should he have the power to vote if he is not part of DT?
I kind of like it the way that it is because it lessens the consolidation of power that DT1 has.
If the vote of DT1 with exclusions > inclusions didn't count, it may have the net effect of making those with inclusions > exclusions all the more powerful. This is not always the case of course, as some "voted out" DT1 don't have any exclusions of DT1 members.
So, meeting the criteria for DT1 is a separate status from having DT1 powers.