So you're saying 87% of the feedback you left was unnecessary. I'm glad you finally realized what many others already knew.
You should add users who left accurate feedback and have good Trust lists to your Trust list, and you should exclude users who leave inaccurate feedback.
So if my Trust feedbacks are correct
(*),
and I predominantly DT trust DT1 users, why aren't you doing as you tell others to do?
My neutral feedback on you is spot on and well deserved:
Trust abuse. This user left unjust negative feedback to 2 users and can't admit he was wrong. It looks like he doesn't understand the difference between a wallet and an exchange, while he's been using on-chain connections to link accounts for years. Unfortunately, I can no longer trust his judgement.
Deleting some negatives long after you received massive backlash from the community doesn't suddenly make me trust your judgement. I think I've been very conservative with negative feedback and Trust exclusions, which also means that by the time I place them, I am pretty sure they're accurate.
Your neutral feedback on my profile on the other hand is incomprehensible:
/ _ \__ _ _ __ __| | ___ _ __ / _ \
/ /_)/ _` | '__/ _` |/ _ \| '_ \ \// /
/ ___/ (_| | | | (_| | (_) | | | | \/
\/ \__,_|_| \__,_|\___/|_| |_| ()
Get a diary.
There's more to a Trust list than inclusions:
I want to see most of the feedback left by those users by default.
@Timelord2067: what's with the red font in neutral feedback?

It looks like you're abusing an unintended forum shortcoming.