[edited out]
Comparing Bitcoin to buying real estate is actually awkward! It really do not make sense. How can you compare two things that cannot be compared. Properties detoriate with time, you will need to spend a large chunk of your profit to maintain the property whereas you will spend nothing to service your Bitcoin... you will sleep, wake up and see your investment increase and multiply. If you calculate how long it will take property investment to give x3, you might probably not be alive to see that happen but in our lifetime, Bitcoin have grown in multiple of several tens.
Anyone who is opportune to know about Bitcoin but still think on the direction of real estate for whatever reason should be seen as unserious.
You make several valid points to differentiate bitcoin and property, but it seems that you are getting caught upon somewhat narrow definitions of property in order to make your points to contrast bitcoin from certain kinds of physical property.. and sure.. no problem with some of that.
At the same time, there are a lot of people making various comparisons of bitcoin to property, including that there are legal definitions that seem to hinge upon bitcoin as a kind of digital property.. and Michael Saylor frequently makes similar kinds of points that rely on descriptions of bitcoin as a kind of property.
For the sake of clarity, property in my submission refers to real estate which was at the center of the discussion. Of course Bitcoin is a property, and owning Bitcoin gives the sense of ownership and the feeling of achievement just like every other possession of value. Maybe I was being too emphatic on the word "property" which might tend to refer to other things. All the same, I still think the comparison of Bitcoin to real estate is not entirely in order;both are entirely different because while real estate belong to the physical world where a lot of factor such as government policy, war, legal tussle and others can lead to outright loss of asset, Bitcoin belong to the digital world and offers less interference, hindrances and legal encumbrances. Even where there is war or conflict, the chances of one losing his Bitcoin is slim unless perhaps the medium of storage is a hardware wallet (which in most cases is even portable). When the war in Ukraine broke out, many
Your overall points still do seem to be valid in terms of making some investment decisions that might include concerns about some of the disadvantages of having to maintain physical property and other ways that physical property is likely vulnerable to being taken from you or even being used against you, and even if bitcoin might not be completely removed from those kinds of threats, the digital attributes of bitcoin does cause the attacks upon it to require different tools and maybe even more challenges for the attacker to be successful in terms of removing you from your coins.
Indeed Bitcoin is vulnerable to attack just like everything in the digital space. You will agree with me that these threats are minimal and manageable compared to the threats in the physical business arena such as I have highlighted in my above.