I believe one of the reasons why the campaign manager and the project team paid upfront for the review was because the review itself will require participants to spend a few dollars in order to successfully try out all the features of the project.
The project had good intentions so that participants wouldn't complain about not having funds to pay for the review service. It's just so sad that someone out there decided to use that to their own advantage by scamming the $90.
Except the member in question has another reason for running away with $90, I never thought a senior member's account will compromise his account because of that sum. The time, input, and cost of data used to build this account are far more than the sum. And I believe this will be the assumption of the manager. He never thought a member with such rank will not honor the contract. I don't blame the campaign manager at all because what he did was to motivate participants to put in their best in the review. His action can discourage managers from paying upfront for a project. But I am glad that it is just one member that had this bad record, which means we have more trustworthy members in the forum.