~snipped~
If all things continue to be equal, AI will continue to be profitable on CEX more than on casinos even though both of them are looking for ways to get his money too
I don't know if I'm just old–school or simply paranoiac as I haven't been able to bring myself to trust Al to do my trading for me. I like it the manual way of doing it myself. Honestly, I feel it's safer to trade and lose it myself to allowing Al trade for me. Als don't have emotions and any sense of judgment that can make them detect when things go awry, especially if a bug occurs in their codes. If there's ever a glitch, An Al is likely to revert and behave in negative to make one incur huge losses. With all the good stories I read about Als I'm still not moved yet to try it out.
The AI I use have a stop lose feature that takes care of that aspect so at that, there is a set percentage as to how much lose it can take before closing the trade automatically so at the end even on a bad day, your lose won't be overly significant.
In trading really AI have recorded a lot of success compared to human efforts in trading because I have tried both, trading manually as a beginner is a fast way to lose, but in the end, you gain some experience, but the fact is that trading is like gambling also, so even with all the experience if luck is not on your side you still can incur loses time to time.
I haven't seen any success recorded with AI in gambling, as I have seen in trading, and that speaks volumes as to what difference it is between the casino system and the exchange system and which one is legit or ringed in results.