Trocador was being pressured by some of their partners who collaborate with LE and practice shotgun KYC to delist eXch by freezing/suspending operations that include coins coming from eXch, because our BTC don't pass AML checks due to not having a known single aggregation address thus it's impossible to identify them as BTC coming from an exchange without providing a proof that it was made on eXch.
Consequently, Trocador has stopped listing eXch in their results.
So I guess I was right when I noticed something strange was happening

I didn't know anything about this stuff happening behind the scenes, but I am not going to use Trocador anymore if they continue doing stuff like this.
There are alternative aggregators I found on kycnot.me like Orangefren, and I am switching over to them instead.
We will probably make a poll somewhere asking our users opinion on how their prefer our service to handle BTC and LTC, having 2 options
I think that majority of members in bitcointalk forum will choose option 1 with high anonymity level, but I do understand people who are concerned because they are using more centralized exchanges.
It's much better to use decentralized exchange like Bisq, but sometimes people trade with others using P2P and other side is often using exchanges like Binance and Coinbase.
There may be also a third option if we make 2 separated pools for mixed and aggregated coins and let users select which pool to use for their output, however it's a lot more complicated to implement and maintain.
Maybe this compromise would work best for everyone, if you can handle extra complexity.