Re: If you used "bx seed" you probably already lost your bitcoins, but if...
...but, the pull request doesn't seem to make any changes that should alter threading behavior, if it does it's incredibly subtle (which I appreciate is often the case with thread-safety bugs)
It does, it makes the random number generator thread specific. See the code after "// Maintain thread static state space."i must be blind, of course it does (maybe I ignored everything after the boost:: ns, I have an aversion to boost)
I don't use github anymore but someone pinged me there, I loaded it-- only to see voskuil shitting on me: https://github.com/libbitcoin/libbitcoin-explorer/issues/728#issuecomment-1677195708 yet another reason to not use that site!
hmmmm...
Quote
This is the reason people roll dice. Trusting the OS is unsecurable.
it's definitely hard to follow this kind of reasoning: because we should all be using dice rolls to seed the RNG, let's make an oblique error message in an obscure part of the repo, to guard against a default operating mode that's catastrophic to users (who apparently received recommendations from Bitcoin Jesus II: The Revenge in "Mastering Bitcoin", an ironic title as it turns out). would an above-average reader of that book even understand the warning message?
why not simply remove ANY insecure mode whatsoever, seeing as the developer was so security conscious? it seems the answer is "demos"
