Yes, what you say, technically it is right. Mine is just an old habit of the "destroy this session" button
Maybe that suggestion will be heard from you if you want it to be valid a little bit longer. But as explained, it has something to do with the users privacy and sinbad don't take those information as it's part of the mixing service. But let's see if that sounds good for the devs.
I personally think it doesn't sound good [me and my own opinion, of course]. If a session needs a manual termination button, there's a chance someone forgot to click the button, and thus, one step backward from privacy [as explained by
examplens and
bhadz]. If dev wants to venture into an option to manually terminate a session, I think it'll be better to reverse the proposed idea; instead of having the manual termination button by default, dev add a check mark to allow people to keep the session longer or until they pressed the termination button. Otherwise, the sessions will end like always.
Not sure about the implications behind this, though. Wouldn't it mean sinbad has to keep a log [albeit selectively] to cater this idea? I can imagine some people will not welcome this idea.
Have you guys checked out the designs that the Bitcointalk members created for the
Sinbad avatar campaign that was brought to an end 2 days ago? There are many really good looking creations there, and picking a winner won't be easy.
Among the designs, I particularly liked bitmover's avatars. I also have my eyes on SamReomo's red-hat-wearing pirate from his second entry. cafter's third design from the third entry looks nice.
Who do you think will win?
I loved
icalical's and
PX-Z's first design, the pixelated ones, purely because it matched the current retro-pixelated theme of the site