Well I will not argue with you, because has been discussed since February this year, and if all you agreed that double creating threads is a very good thing to do in the local board, then there is no alarm to blow. Let it be and I am here to watch out too. Mr. Igebotz unofficial thread has stated it clear that there should be no
- 10. No duplicate thread/Topic is allowed.
And your topic is just a paraphrasing to the first topic. And this is what newbies were doing that we corrected. I mentioned your rank because you were here when we were correcting the newbies and which means no suppose imitate again and all what I am trying to sae be sae you for make comment on the other thread because they are related.
Well @Majestic-milf, I will not argue with you because di way u understand it is very far from me. So if say me I spam the thread by making di first comment means sae u no understand di meaning of Spamming. And if sae day from dis my 2nd thread then e for make sense. And for di Op, nothing is there at di Op to comprehend. All I am saying let make di local board clean from duplicating of topics.
Enough of all this.
All they are trying to make you understand is that there is difference in the thread as @CryptoHeadlineNews has explain below
Secondly, I will say I see no similarity between this post and the one you share above @ Mate2237 because there is now how "Bureau De Change asking Govt to ban Binance to save Naira" the same with "Nigeria government don return Bureau De Change", because if had the title of the first post been "Bureau De Change & all you need to know about it", then this thread would have best been a continuation, but for the fact it wasn't titled that way, it's okay been a single thread.
There is actually a difference between the two threads; they carry different information with the name of Bureau De Change; the first one was a request from Bureau De Change to ban Binance, while this particular thread was about the Nigerian government that brought Bureau De Change back after the government, in the initial stage, was suspecting them of dollar price manipulation.
Many of our colleagues find your reply to be harsh as you included the OP's rank before making your suggestion or correction, as the case may be, which is true; you can make corrections in good manners that will look perfect for everyone, and we will understand, but your reply was harsh and your evidence is not too good to be considered right because indeed this is not a duplicate thread as you were saying because the two threads contain different messages.