Wearing a signature doesn’t imply full endorsement of the underlying service,
Sorry man, but this sounds like gas-lighting and deflection. To be honest, I don't care. You can use whatever logic or philosophical gymnastics you want to excuse and justify the signature you wear, that's not my point.
We are all grown up adult here. Financially sovereign individuals. If anyone falls into a scam, it their sole responsibility.
As a member of a very loyal community, I will do what I can to avoid anyone falling into a scam, included thoughtfully testing the service I advertise. But in the end, the above sentence still stands.
What's ironic is that whirlwind seemed like the most legit mixer to pop up in the post CM days, yet here we are.
This is very true and I also felt they were somehow, tied.
I was wrong, apparently.