I see many people who say Erling Haaland disappear in the field like you say, because they think Haaland is not suitable for the games against stronger teams and that's why people think Haaland is just a player who can have good performances against the teams with a weak defending system, while he is not because other teams usually focus on Haaland to make this player stop.
Are you kidding? I meant is there a proof why haaland was not suitable against the strong team. What about UCL last season? haaland was always scoring a lot against the big club in UCL. It sounds nonsense if you called that haaland was not suitable for the game against the big team.
Haaland was not able to perform so well due to the lack of good pass toward him. There might be someone who will supply the ball for him. Haaland was rarely getting the ball. It was also impacting his performance in the match against newcastle.
He was a natural striker and he will always try to maximizing his positioning. We are still in the early game of english premier league. Haaland gonna performs even better in the upcoming match.
Just wait and see everything gonna be okay for him.
There will always be some people that dislike certain players and that's normal, you can't expect everyone to like one player, that can't happen. Haaland scored a lot of goals last year, but on the last games he failed to score as we all know, the main reason for that was the simple fact that he was man marked tightly, which allowed others to score instead.
Even when City was beating Real 4-0, Rudiger was on Haaland like a flea and he didn2t leave him, which means that other 4 goals happened very easily considering Rudiger couldn't defend anyone else. Any person with football knowledge would know that it is not Haaland failing to score, it is Haaland getting the defense out of the way for his teammates to score easier.