Post
Topic
Board Service Announcements
Re: [ANN] Whirlwind.money | ⚡No Fee⚡ | Ultimate Privacy | Anonymity Mining 12% APR🔥
by
famososMuertos
on 21/08/2023, 00:12:25 UTC
Thanks to all those involved for the prompt solution and to all those affected in pending deposits, who have given their opinions and/or reflections about the w.m, I think it is a "big" triumph within all the worst that means an exit scam.


Regarding the $40,000 DAI, they were no obligation to leave that money in an escrow.
...//..,,,
Very good tools to execute a scam, but to make things even better, you can just pretend that you don't even care about the 40k in escrow, it makes people think that you have way too much money to attempt a scam -- since you are spending tens of thousands of dollars on ads, left 40k in escrow when nobody asked you to, you must be sitting on a ton of money to scam my 0.01 BTC, so you are likely to be trusted.

...//...

I remember that I deposited in the first days of June and in those days I asked a question in the thread in question, but I also added that an escrow should be used in the equivalence of the amount of deposits that were arising,  and to be honest, I'm not attributing anything to myself, but it's not as you say, at least someone had an opinion about it, and if you look at it from that point of view, these guys were evaluating all the edges that were presented.

__
In any case, believing that one is inviolable or "they are not going to scam me," it is the first mistake that we can make, regardless of the level of experience one has. Since the scam that is going to "fuck" us is the one that we do not know about and yes, such an assertion may seem inconsistent, but then what happens?... as now, is that we see lights, indications where before all it was "normal".

I do not feel lucky for the escrow that was there to save my deposit. Although of course, come on!, obviously thanks that existed, but also lucky to keep me on the idea: " I risked money that I could afford to lose".

But! honestly I must say that if two users whom I have a lot of confidence, they would have been part of the SC, I would have put more money, but also under the same previous premise.

That is the question of the matter here and of any scam in which we find ourselves involved under our own interests, we can not surrender all the confidence of our money at the risk of the trust of others.

Then...! Although there is a debate there in that sense, I think this thread should be kept in order to preserve the idea that any project is safe only under your decisions in the capacity of what you can risk.

And! that those in charge of it here in the forum (for any project that arrives) are a way out and not a guarantee of the risks involved in losing money.