Alright, after numerous calculations, I've come to the point where I need someone who is interested in puzzle 66 and capable of counting 48 bits within a few minutes. I have a total of 588 ranges for them to work on, with the opportunity to claim the prize of 6.6 BTC. Alternatively, if the author of the puzzle – the one who created this challenge to test the difficulty of increasing bits – has come across my post, I challenge them to assist me in improving my counting speed. I am confident in my ability to crack puzzle 66 in a matter of days.
im ready to work with you
As previously mentioned, I have a total of 588 ranges, where is a private key of puzzle 66. Each range requires a 48-bit computation (I am referring to GPU computation). and I am seeking an individual who is capable of performing these computations within few minutes or at least an hour.
As for our collaboration approach, I am currently developing a script to scan all 588 ranges. Once the private key is obtained, the script will automatically perform the following actions: 2% of the amount will be deducted as fees, 59% will be sent to the individual performing the computations, and 39% will be sent to me. my bitcoin address and the computation performer's bitcoin address will be pre-entered into the script. The reason for allocating 59% to the computation performer is due to their resource usage, whether through GPU rental or electricity consumption. I intend to share the entire script with the individual to ensure transparency, while keeping the ranges known only to me. Once the script initiates, neither of us will have any access to it. But when scanning of one range completed, it will be saved along with the proof of work. Certainly, it will take me some time to perform all these processes.
So why not continue searching for that person in the meantime?
(This range is an example of 588 ranges: 3b07a000000000000:3b07affffffffffff, and this address is for proof of work: 1GYpdGZBaqRDKkpFWbaRezrVeGy6g6UNfE, 1Ngdkik5LLGzmzYUWKiPYDQ6CRRGWCPo5L, 19XbiMqyqeaJLDSvHLzhJkxngDYsBPXTQo, 13zb1hQbWVsc2S7ZTZnP2G4undNNpdh5so)
The person who will perform the counting of this range needs to be scanned and to post here with proof of work, or they can personally DM me as well. In this interaction, I will assess their operational speed in completing this 48-bit range. For scanning, they can use any software, but my suggestion is to use 'VanBitCrackenS v1.0' because here they can take advantage of multi-GPU. If the puzzle address falls within this range, then it will be yours. 👍
what would the scanner get for wasting time and resources if the keys needed don't fall within these ranges?