The only strategy that can beat the house is to quit while still winning profits. This way the house can't have the chance to recover the winnings of the player. And best if the player withdraws it and use it elsewhere worthy.
And if you didn't win from the very first, then how are you going to beat the house? If you win, it means that you are purely lucky and then it absolutely depends on you what you'll do with your money. You can't never beat the house with any strategy and it's not actually a strategy to stop gamble after winning because you need luck to win, you have to be one in a million.
-snip-
But, I repeat, the business model of the casino, as it seems to me, is not affected by such personal and purely individual streaks of luck, success, or, accordingly, bad luck and losses.
Of course not. If that were the case, there would hardly be a casino left on the market. For casinos, the statistics in combination with the house edge simply play a big role. For example, if a casino like Roobet has a House Edge of 10%, they win 10% more often than they lose. Of course, this also applies to each player individually: The more often a player plays, the more his individual win and loss statistics align with the House Edge.
What could happen in extremely rare cases is that a whale gets lucky and sends a casino into bankruptcy. However, I would not have come across such a case yet and you would probably actually need someone with a lot of Bitcoins ... and a lot of luck.
Roobet has a house edge of 1% on dice, right? If they increase it up to 10%, that won't mean that they'll win 10% more often than they lose. House edge of 10% mean that casino expects to profit 10% from your bet, in other words, if you bet $100, with the house edge of 10%, casino expects to profit $10.