Re: Request: Disable JayJuanGee in the Wall Observer thread
⭐ Merited by vapourminer (1)
This seems relevant:
Aside from that, if people complain about whether things deserve merit at all, then that's something to perhaps think about, but if you conclude that they're wrong, then that's that. You don't need to stress about it or defend yourself constantly. It's conceivable that someday you and I will end up disagreeing too much about this stuff and I'll remove your source status, but it's really not a big deal.
The topsendban list is just a first indication of abuse, and many excellent people are on it. Your place on there acts as a sort of benchmark: eg. chandra12 has a similar score there, but whereas you are an extremely active merit-giver with a diverse selection of posts merited (most of which anyone would agree with), chandra12 only has two large merit sends. His behavior in comparison to yours while having a similar topsendban score is what creates a strong abuse impression.
I appreciate the work of you and other sources who take it seriously!
See Top senders to permabanned users, last 180 days, here's the top 10:The topsendban list is just a first indication of abuse, and many excellent people are on it. Your place on there acts as a sort of benchmark: eg. chandra12 has a similar score there, but whereas you are an extremely active merit-giver with a diverse selection of posts merited (most of which anyone would agree with), chandra12 only has two large merit sends. His behavior in comparison to yours while having a similar topsendban score is what creates a strong abuse impression.
I appreciate the work of you and other sources who take it seriously!
Quote
59: fillippone
31: JayJuanGee
28: Julien_Olynpic
26: ETFbitcoin
24: NotATether
24: o_e_l_e_o
24: The Sceptical Chymist
20: CryptopreneurBrainboss
18: irhact
17: DdmrDdmr
Should I update How many banned users have you merited??31: JayJuanGee
28: Julien_Olynpic
26: ETFbitcoin
24: NotATether
24: o_e_l_e_o
24: The Sceptical Chymist
20: CryptopreneurBrainboss
18: irhact
17: DdmrDdmr
Nice list I need to get out of WO more often.
I'd like to see that list updated, I'd be interested to see how many I've fucked up on.
I have a notoriously fast ignore trigger so...
Also I think you should order that list (in the thread) by percentage rather than absolute which seems to me to be a much better metric as it can be incorrectly interpreted as displayed. Obviously those who distribute larger amounts will hit the scum more often then those that don't distribute at all.
Now if I wanted to start a witchunt, I'd start at those with the highest percentage.
I think The WO should have its own Ban power (within WO thread) and then we can just lose those twatter spammers permanently.
The Fact Twatter does not even allow the reading of a thread without signing in make that cesspool not worth the effort to click the link anymore so I'd love to see all links to it blocked ala imgur.