You are WRONG. Mixers aren't effective because they don't provide privacy to their users and the cost could not be higher because your coins get stolen.
1. Disprove my claim by linking my ChipMixer deposits to my withdrawals: bc1qkp6s48ghcq23y4w0l0vy0d6dd288ejdrx0cq0r. I'll wait.
2. I can bare that cost if needed. Thanks for your interest.
You're LYING- There is an identical service available where custody is not relinquished: It's called coinjoin.
No, you're lying. A coinjoin provides minimum privacy levels, comparably to all the available mixer funds most of the times, and the chain analysis only needs to follow the outputs from that specifically coinjoin, whereas in the mixer case, they'll have to de-anonymize every single mixer withdrawal transaction.
LIAR, you said you would rather have your property than your privacy after the Chipmixer scam
And indeed, I'd rather have my coinjoins mixed through Whirlpool, than use mixers, because I recently discovered it. What I'd absolutely not want to do is use Wasabi, as I'd literally fund mass surveillance and would use a provably faulty software (a fact which you're denying, but anyway).
With that being said, this will likely be the last response to you. You are disregarding all constructive input that people are giving you and resorting to whataboutism.