Perhaps these fiat- crypto payment gateways are ditching casino businesses because it might seem that they have less profit and more regulators bearing down as compared to others who don't focus on casino businesses at all.
One shouldn't blame them for the decision to ditch casinos but be hopeful instead that other crypto- payment gateways would be developed to facilitate fiat- crypto payments for emerging casino businesses who are yet to discover this looming issue.
^ This was what I thought too, in addition, this situation could also lead to opportunities for the development of specialized payment solutions catering specifically to emerging casino businesses. We know there will always be innovation in this there is potential for new gateways to emerge and provide the much-needed infrastructure for fiat-crypto transactions within the casino sector. The decision by fiat-crypto payment gateways to distance themselves from casino businesses probably indeed be influenced by the unique challenges and regulatory scrutiny that the casino industry often faces. These gateways could be prioritizing stability and compliance to ensure their long-term viability, that is my personal opinion only.