Oh, here we go again, the hero who wanted to save everyone from gambling is here again!
I know that I'm not a scammer, a gambler, a scumbag, or anyone who contributes negatively to this community.
Would you rather me change my long-standing opinion on the gambling industry because I have a signature for a gambling site in my signature?
So, you are not a gambler, and if you weren't a gambler in a previous life, just how long is this long-standing opinion on gambling you have?
Just asking, you know, because it really feels weird, really....weird!
As for saying that I knew WW was a scam BEFORE it was a scam. Yes, there were several red flags - however none had conclusive evidence Whirlwind was a scam UNTIL Whirlwind was a scam. So it's BS to say that I "held back this information" and even more BS to act as if I am worse than the perpetrators.
You're actually still withholding information since you claimed you know more about WW and the buys behind the whole scheme than everyone, yet, you refused to show any info.
Further down the road, I'm curious about one more thing, you say you don't care about a campaign, you don't care what that is about as long as you get paid, all this feels weird when I look at your trust :
bbc.reporter 2023-07-19 Promoting scam casino BC.Game in signature.
you've tagged bbc.reporter for promoting a scam, which alone would be strange seeing how you defend your right to promote everything as long as you get paid but far more interesting, you haven't tagged the casino itself for being a scam. Why?
You see, you're full of contradictions, and this is quite ironic, since the whole thing started with you claiming to have a higher IQ, and high IQ
gamblers such as yourself aren't known for doing stupid things as you do right here right now.