Post
Topic
Board Meta
Merits 1 from 1 user
Re: cryptofrka's Merit Source application - gambling boards
by
1miau
on 28/08/2023, 01:09:16 UTC
⭐ Merited by JollyGood (1)
Disagree.

No one should be a merit source for one of the most unethical boards/sections of this forum. There is no shortage of merit for the amount of quality/merit worthy posts in the gambling section; which is very little in comparison to other, more important and non capitalistic boards of the forum.

I also think merits should not be focused on posts in this section. It does not positively contribute to the Bitcoin economy. It only concentrates wealth to unethical network participants who are exploring other users with unfair odds, ridiculous terms of service, extensive and intrusive kyc checks to ban accounts, questionable provably fair claims, and more.

What an irony. Yet you are participating in a campaign that promotes gambling. I do not see any reason why you would call it an unethical board/section of this forum.
BenCodie reminds me of that shitposter who advertised a gambling site in his signature but in his shitposts, he opposed gambling:



Why wearing a signature if you don't like such a site at all.  Huh
Main problem are stupid (or greedy) campaign participants but of course campaign managers could shut this down as well. After all, such participants are just not suited to be any longer in such a campaign and getting paid an handsome amount of valuable BTC for opposing (any?) gambling site...



Discussion about gambling is not worthy of needing a merit source. My post stands.
Luckily, only a tiny minority is sharing your uneducated opinion.  Cheesy



After all, cryptofrka knows very well where good posts in our Gambling section are under-merited and that's why in this topic is also massive support for cryptofrka's application.  Smiley