Re: Request: Disable merits in the Wall Observer thread

No no no no no no nooooooo.... Do not disable this topic Because we need fucking easy merit with our shitpost Cheesy

Honestly, I would like to know how the Wall Observer is easier to get mertis, compared to other areas of the forum?
I don't understand this theory. But, okay.

short version?

at any given time half the WO regulars are drunk and the other half might as well be drunk.

Nah, I think they are more generous with the posts they like and they won't reduce their generosity levels. Call them drunk or generous it's up-to you, but I'm quite sure that they only merit the posts that they find useful. Sometimes they may merit each other for humorous posts as well and other times they enjoy meme related posts especially something related to Bitcoin.

OK. Valid observation... and may even make sense.

Now, is the problem with the board or with those who give it merits? And who gives merits there, are they newcomers or sources of merits?

If they are merits sources, we are calling into question the credibility of these sources. Because they are the ones who give the merits, not the ones who write things there.

I attempted to address some of these supposed concerns about purported abusive merit source members in my response in Bob's "parody, but not parody" thread that proclaims that I am the bleeding-heart, irresponsible, merit-distributing (rewarding) problem.