The current Type 3 Flag claims this:
decodx alleges: whirlwindmoney violated a written contract, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced
here.
whirlwindmoney did not make the victims of this act roughly whole, AND it is not the case that all of the victims forgave the act. It is not grossly inaccurate to say that the act occurred around August 2023. No previously-created flag covers this same act, unless the flag was created with inaccurate data preventing its acceptance.
As far as I can see, the bold part is no longer correct, which means the Flag should no longer be Supported.
Why isn't it correct anymore? Did whirlwindmoney make any efforts to solve the situation? Did he ever say that deposited funds should be used to solve this situation? What did he do to solve the situation? I see nothing. What you highlighted with bold looks like he should make active efforts to solve this exact situation. So at least he should come and confirm that all was done right.
So I don't think that it is something obvious even if escrow guy made efforts to solve the problem. I see no clear action from whirlwindmoney.
I'd say that it is an ambiguous situation.