The current Type 3 Flag claims this:
decodx alleges: whirlwindmoney violated a written contract,
resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced
here.
whirlwindmoney did not make the victims of this act roughly whole, AND it is not the case that all of the victims forgave the act. It is not grossly inaccurate to say that the act occurred around August 2023. No previously-created flag covers this same act, unless the flag was created with inaccurate data preventing its acceptance.
As far as I can see, the bold part is no longer correct, which means the Flag should no longer be Supported.
1- The act DID result in damages
2- WW did NOT make the victims roughly whole, it just so happened they left some funds in escrow.
I believe the flag still stands perfectly valid, untill WW show up and make the victims roughly whole.
We can even argue that BTC price was higher on the day they stopped working compared to when we got our money from escrow, so there is at least a small damage that has not been fixed.
My understanding of this type of this flag is the accused party MUST fix the issue themselves, in other words, if there was no fund in escrow and someone managed to hack WW's server and paid the victims, does that also mean this flag is not valid? i do not think this is what theymos means.