Question @theymos: what if a custodial website owner ended all communications, disabled withdrawals, still accepts deposits, but had enough money in escrow to cover all current victims?
I'm talking about
the whirlwindmoney case. As far as I know, this is the first time this happened since the Flag system was created.
Based on this:
Creating or supporting a scammer flag is actively affirming a set of pretty clear fact-statements.
I think the type 3 Flag can't be Supported in this case. But I also know it's one large deposit away from someone losing their money. It needs a big red warning banner, but (the way I read it) can't get one right now. It's a rare case that doesn't seem to fit the Flag system, and a Newbie warning Flag seems insufficient.