While I trust Loyce judgment I think he got it wrong this time, removing vote may be "ok", but going as far as opposing the flag is surely wrong IMO, it is like saying the whole story was a lie and WW did nothing bad, I think you should keep the flag and I think people should support it.
Yeap, that's it. LoyceV convinced me that in ambiguous situation the support of a flag can be unnecessary, but at the same time as the situation is still ambiguous I see no reason for opposing it. As usual there's a third way, not doing any of these.
And keeping in mind that this situation is still ambiguous, I think that everyone has a right to see this situation in a different light and keep their votes.
Until consensus is found (what will hardly happen, as to me) IMO both voting for and not voting for this flag is okay. I'm not sure that opposing is right as it is not a clear case and we are not a jury.