I don't think the argument is that those who deserve merit don't receive it, it's about those who don't deserve it (shitposters) receiving it.
Anyway, WO is where posting low-effort twitter copypasta can get you merits (especially if it's "bullish"), and shitposters are exploiting that. There aren't many, if any, other places on the forum like that. So your extrapolation here is incorrect.
Anyway, WO is where posting low-effort twitter copypasta can get you merits (especially if it's "bullish"), and shitposters are exploiting that. There aren't many, if any, other places on the forum like that. So your extrapolation here is incorrect.
But who gives merits?
Are each other's alts doing this? I repeat, for this you do not need the WO.
Now, are large forum merit sources distributing these merits to these spammers? I have serious doubts.
Unfortunately, what I saw, in a little analysis I did of this topic, is that it is used for users to attack each other. And halfway through, the guys distribute merits just to tease. In other words, because they start making accusations, many are making fun of the situation. Is this beautiful? No. But, when you start to question the credibility of those who give merits, and want to control how people give merits to each other, that's what happens.
I think it would be good for the main players in this situation to calm down and move on.
