managing total risk per platform is definitely a smart strategy
if you care about privacy too them opting for casinos without kyc is a good ideia though you probably won't find many or will find more with lower volume than the big ones.
what are other strategies you usually use?
and yes there are only few of Non KYC casinos now because of government as this leaves them no choice but to brace the regulations ,so if that is the only option then what should they act?
but my strategy is mostly limiting my funds to spend because for me that is the safest way at least to prevent everything that is not necessary .
Well, if the law states that you have to have KYC to operate as a casino then you have to get that information, that's just how it is. There are a few, even at the very top, that do not ask for it straight up and only ask for it when something happens but I have to say that's going to be a troublesome thing on the long run.
I think it's quite important to remember that we are talking about a situation where it's out of casinos hands to ask for it or not, if they do ask for it then they can exist, but if they do not ask for it then they will be basically considered as a illegally managed casino and the governments will be after them. I think gambling being illegal is a tough decision, I still think it should be legal.
It is necessary for these casinos to abide the law to be able to get a license, that includes asking for KYC. We don't want to play on a casino without license, right? Because that means they're not operating legally. Thus, it's quite common now for a centralized casinos to ask their players to verify their identity. Though some of them (as you've said) don't ask beforehand and will just do it after something happened or you win huge and exceeds the withdrawal limit to be ask for kyc.
Nevertheless, it's understandable if many gamblers still don't like this idea but that's how it is, if you want to continue playing then expect this procedure will be ask sooner or later.