Regarding suspicious activities, it is always good that we as players always keep in mind that any activity that a casino considers suspicious is not a big deal, for a casino suspicious activity, what can it be? enter with a VPN? And if the person is traveling and is in a country where they are not allowed to enter the casino, but they have their account, then they have the right to enter from a VPN because if they are in an important tournament, then they will not be able to enter? Or that a person tries to withdraw every time he wins something, why can't he do it? Or so that person tries to make several deposits, so he can't do it? These are things that I will never understand why a casino considers an activity suspicious.
In case there is a suspicion, it shouldn't be thought of as not a big deal. Once you are suspected by the casino, you will be monitored and possibly unable to access your acount until the suspicion is cleared. With regards to the use of VPN, we must clarify first if it is allowed to use VPN or not. We will be in trouble if we happen to use a VPN thinking that it is ok since we are not in the restricted area but find out that any means of VPN usage is not accepted by the casino. This will bring trouble in your account, so we must always think first and inquire before using anything that can possibly jeopardize our account.
The case with VPN usage can mostly be dealt with when it involve new accounts since most of those that use VPN also use it to create multiple accounts on the casino either to claimabuses or abusing the casino with such bonuses, This is aside from the other fact that those that use VPN do so to avoid restrictions.
But in a case where the account is already a verified one, the player can use a VPN to gamble freely from anywhere that way, the casino already knows that such a gambler is doing so with clear intentions.
Some casino permits the use of VPN but also outlines its limitation and usage restrictions
Yes, it is very true, in fact there are casinos such as Bitcasino that have their own blog where they have very interesting articles and there is one in particular that talks about VPNs and casinos, how is it that they do accept the use of the VPN without any problem, which I applaud because I think that it is that they value the fact that they use the VPN and accept it much more than other casinos, this should be an example for other casinos, so that they can do something similar and so on take the lead, I believe that people who do this with a VPN and skip the priorities that their own countries have imposed on them that prevent them from entering to play in a casino, because I consider that entering a casino is not something that asks to be considered as illegal, if we don't see it from a much deeper perspective, we realize that governments always look for excuses to have control over people, not only crypto, and especially eprsoans that use bitcoin, they also mess with something that is fun, the casinos, they want to regulate, they want to know every movie, and if they do not submit to their licenses, then they simply do not operate in that country, what absurd things, but like that It is, what seems totally absurd is that a casino adheres to that and does not allow the use of the casino to people from countries that are considered banned.
I am very surprised that the USA is one of the countries that is usually suspended in some casinos, in the case of stake.us it is a great option that you have so that you can do things right there, it offers you the same services and operates From the USA, this is a great achievement, but apart from the USA you can see many efforts by people from other countries, in China, African countries, some South American countries where they are permanently banned, which I don't see sense in, However, as I said before, I applaud those casinos that do allow the use of VPN, and that allow free taste so that people from other countries have that freedom to play.
This raises a natural question: if a player uses a VPN, then this automatically means that he either simply bypasses possible blocking of the casino site in the country where he really lives.
Or it may be an option that such a player, in principle, wants to remain completely anonymous and even tries to hide the real country where he is located. So in this second case there is one very unpleasant contradiction. It lies in the fact that if a player wins a large amount in a casino, then it is very likely that the casino will require him to undergo the KYC procedure and fully reveal his identity.
Otherwise, he will not be allowed to transfer the money won to his wallet. In this case, the use of a VPN will obviously create problems with identification. In particular, for this reason, as I think, the casino may well find fault and begin to oppose the payment of this winnings in every possible way. At the same time, the natural question from the casino is, why did the player actually use VPN at all?
If the player simply bypassed the blocking of the site of this casino, adopted by the decision of the regulatory authorities of the country, then the player violated local laws and regulations, but if he hides his identity in case of receiving undeclared income from winnings, and uses a VPN, then he also violates local laws.
As a result, everything turns out badly.
You are right, in particular there is a way out for this questioning, I could say that I am from a prohibited country, it certainly is, but why use VPNs to be more anonymous and have more privacy, but a person who is You can ask a favor that is from an allowed country, obviously you can comply with the KYC, but you used the VPN for the simple fact that you were in that country, because you reside in the other, so that is a way out, not very ethical but if exit, although things when it comes to VPNs can happen quite the opposite, the perxozna could have complied with the KYC and obviously used a VPN to be able to play from a country that is prohibited and then when he did it is considered a infringement? It is something that should not be, also if that happens, can a casino not pay for it either? I think so, and a person who complies with her KYC would already get rid of that problem.
The KYC thing will always be a problem, but a VPN shouldn't be, by now a casino should accept VPNs, but things when it comes to regulations will come a moment where they won't even accept others to play, and then that will become something where they can no longer be in a casino, because a person who wants to maintain their anonymity and privacy is something that is not worth it, in fact many users here on the forum consider it that way, they believe that Their privacy is essential and they need to take care of it, I respect that very much, and if everyone went with that trend, I think there would be more things or much more anonymous, the bad thing is that when they are decentralized casinos it is very disappointing to the players, because it is Like more commitment, I read a long time ago that a decentralized casino charged for each movement that the player makes, so these things are what can stop players , of course if he is a player who has a lot of money, well, no, but he must have everything those kinds of precautions.