@BenCodie: read this:...
My advice: stay out of the forum drama.
BitcoinGirl.Club's DT trust of BenCodie in the last 24 or so hours is more to do with their mutual distrust of JG than the *cough* quality of BenCodie's trust feed-backs given BenCodie has slapped JG with negative trust feedback...
Actually agree with you on this one. It's not trust feedback that I agree with or approve of as it certainly shouldn't be negative based on some opinion. Ideally BitcoinGirl.Club would re-consider this inclusion.
When you get neutral feedback you don't like and retaliate with negative feedback it never looks good, despite how you might try and paint it, re: BenCodie
AFAIK using the trust system is about whether or not you trust someone based on your experience with them. Right now, all I have seen from JollyGood is internet-nazism (for better lack of a term) and on top of that, my recent direct experience of him twisting truth into stories that would be incriminating
if they were true.
This is a serious violation of my trust, hence I have given him a negative one.
The reason why JollyGood has not retaliated is because he is not entirely bad, he does know that his feedback is based on misconstrued facts and hence, it's neutral and not negative.
@BenCodie: read this:...
My advice: stay out of the forum drama.
BitcoinGirl.Club's DT trust of BenCodie in the last 24 or so hours is more to do with their mutual distrust of JG than the *cough* quality of BenCodie's trust feed-backs given BenCodie has slapped JG with negative trust feedback...
I think that the feedbacks I've left are all good descriptions for those whom which I left them for.
You're just one of those who cries foul when some one leaves NEUTRAL trust feedback.
... and then post this:
| | JollyGood | | 2023-09-02 | | Reference | | If you make an opinion on the character of JollyGood, it is likely that he will find a way to retaliate with brute force; trying to twist words to give you a negative label, and/or misconstruing facts and time to make you seem untrustworthy. At least, this has been my experience with JollyGood. I commented on him being a complete and utter stickler, this lead to a false theory about me "knowing about a scam before it scammed" (not true) along with countless negative labels. Based on this experience, I do not trust JollyGood. |
@BenCodie: read this:
The system is for handling trade risk, not for flagging people for good/bad posts/personalities/ideas.
You can't use "Negative - You think that trading with this person is high-risk." because you don't like his posts about you.
Also, he has a point: your posts about WWM (claiming you knew they were going to scam, but not saying anything about it) didn't make much sense.
My advice: stay out of the forum drama.
I didn't
know about WW becoming a scam. I saw red flags, which grew over time, there is a huge difference. Put short, jollygood's accusation is that I have been concealing evidence and facts, the reality is that I was quietly under growing suspicion.
If someone misconstrues, lies, gives negative labels, etc. Their trade risk is higher than that of a person without these trusts. Negative feedback is justified IMO, but if I'll give further consideration at another point.