Chelsea never played well. Its defenders were always often making blunders while at the same time its attackers were unable to scoring the goal. That's why EA was rated whole of chelsea players so badly. Even mudryk never made even a single goal since he was coming to the club. I don't even know why this team looks like the stupidest club in EPL. Nottingham forest is far better than chelsea. I must admit if this thing was true.
Look at how chelsea defeated by nottingham forest at stamford bridge which was surprising anyone. Many fans were feeling satisfied with the current performance of chelsea. Pochettino's tactic just remind me with potter.
Many complaints were coming to the club. I feel that if nothing change happened to the club. Chelsea played even badly than last season.
The club could still get perfect results last season in winning some early matches in a row while this time it's only able winning a match against weaker team like luton.
Their players are still not in sync with each other which makes it a bit tricky for Chelsea. On the other hand, it is true that they currently have a bad condition in attack but looking at the current condition I think it is a natural thing where risks like this will happen if we change too much from starting players and coaches.
One loss, one draw and 2 defeats are not very good if you look at the current conditions but I think with the current conditions it is actually still fixable and Pochettino can take Chelsea in a better direction just waiting for whether he will fall down with all the criticism or actually rise to be better.