We all want the best for the forum, but we often make decisions based on emotions rather than facts, and most DT find it difficult to fix their mistakes because they don't want to look like idiots, but trust me when I say there is no shame in doing what is right. When the Bitlucy scandal broke, most of us were swept up in the OP story, and even a flag was created against Royse, but when the truth came out, we realised that the customers were not the only victims of the scam; Royse too was a victim.


I agree with NotATether that the second feedback did not justify what really happened, Royse was not in charge of the hot wallet vault and was not given any backend access to the site, from what was reviewed he was only offered co-partner to take care of promotion and ANN management, Bitlucy were so clean that no one could have predicted that they would scam their customers in the future. He received the same punishment as other customers who deposited. It was never his responsibility to refund victims; yet, he tried his utmost to reimburse campaign victims because he personally hired them.

When Luna's investors were burned, none of the Luna influencers, marketers, or promoters were held liable for refunding the victims. Marketers' rights are restricted. Royse has paid for his recklessness and has managed over ten successfully projects afterwards.  Nail him to the cross for one fault out of 100 is just too harsh.

I truly want both of you to finish this drama without causing any further dramas. If I were JG, I would change it to Neutral and rewrite my sentence. The same to efialtis.

JG is someone I respect and with whom I have shared some of my personal experiences, but if he makes a bad decision, I tell him to his face. Only someone who cares will tell you that you have faeces on your teeth. Haters will laugh and turn away.