Hi, I'm not on the forum much these days, but thought I'd better check in and see how the ol' Kraken is doing.
Still no sign of it, eh?
Still no sign of it, eh?
Well, keeping in mind voter fraud (if actually found evidence of it) is a serious business in any country which call herself democratic, you would have heard about it if anything relevant happened. If not in left wing mainstream media, you should have heard of it on Fox, but since they try to amplify as much as the can whatever they can find on fraud, they are not obviously reliable.
Better just check the status of lawsuits concerning voting fraud or voting irregularities, unbiased information on the ruling of judges and whatnot. In the end, as years pass all starts to be about bread and circus, including threads like this one. The Kraken is still missing let us see if stays that way forever, though.
For decades election fraud has been inching its way into elections through the voting process. Now that the fraud has become something blatantly right out in the open, people are fighting to return the process to honesty. It will take time. It should have started long ago. But no great threat was seen until Trump's election was stolen by the process, and then Kari Lake's.
The REAL question is, now that the Kraken's rise is finally in view, will what the Kraken has to offer be any better than the fraud of the past?
Court Finds Arizona's Signature Matching Process Unlawful in 'Massive Win' for Election
https://www.technocracy.news/court-finds-arizonas-signature-matching-process-unlawful-in-massive-win-for-election-integrity/
Yavapai County Superior Court Judge John Napper issued a ruling last week (pdf) in a lawsuit against Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes brought by public interest group Restoring Integrity and Trust in Elections (RITE), which alleged that Mr. Fontes broke the law regarding mail-in ballot signature verification procedures.
Specifically, the group argued that Mr. Fontes' interpretation of "registration record" in the Secretary of State's Elections Procedures Manual was unreasonably broad and improperly expanded the pool of signatures to which an early ballot affidavit signature could be compared, increasing the risk of false positives.
"While state law requires county recorders to match mail-ballot signatures with signatures in the voter's 'registration record,' the Secretary instructed them to use a broader and less reliable universe of comparison signatures," RITE said in a Sept. 5 statement on the court ruling.
"That means the Secretary was requiring ballots to be counted despite using a signature that did not match anything in the voter's registration record. This was a clear violation of state law," the group added.
Former gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake, who sued Mr. Fontes and Maricopa County officials over the signature verification process that was used in last year's election, took to X to post about the decision.
"A court just found that Arizona's signature matching process is UNLAWFUL," Ms. Lake said.
"This is what happens when you don't back down from a fight," the Kari Lake War Room account said in a post on X.
Mr. Fontes' office did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the ruling.
...
