Since the coordinator code is all open source, you get to decide your own criteria yourself.
Are you going to go back to suggesting that we can run our own coordinators if we don't agree to what zkSNACKS is doing? Touching upon that subject again is a waste of time. We are now talking about your coordinator, as in the default coordinator. zkSNACKS accepts whatever assessment the blockchain analysis company makes about coin dirtiness and won't allow such coins to coinjoin. Right or wrong?
And the open-source nature of Wasabi or your coordinator doesn't matter on the subject of taint. It's the blockchain analysis firm that determines taint according to their interpretations. The questions I asked and you didn't answer are about that. So, here they are again.
How do you know stolen coins are getting rejected? You keep talking about open-source, where can we see these rules publicly?
According to whose criteria will certain UTXOs be added to whatever list is being used to determine naughtiness of coins?
Who made that list and in whose name? What entity or government agency is responsible to maintain it, make changes, and decide what's good and what's bad?
Who do I get in touch with if my UTXOs were rejected for reasons unknown to me?