Coordinators do not have the power to execute Sybil attacks without being detected, so coordinators cannot delegate such a power to a chain analysis company.
I mean, definitely a lie. A coordinator randomly rejecting inputs can do quite noticeable harm to the coinjoin.
BlackHatCoiner, why haven't you set up a WabiSabi coordinator yet?
Because I want to be as much detached from Wasabi as possible. You can call it dogma, but I just don't want to run their software, especially when there are better alternatives. There have been multiple accusations of it being flawed, and I don't have the liquidity to make an attractive coordinator, which is pretty much the same for the average coinjoin user. I'm also encouraged to work on more decentralized solutions, like Joinmarket which is by the way more Sybil resistant than Wasabi, as it utilizes
fidelity bonds.
Since no one on this thread is coordinating coinjoins themselves, it's proof that all the petitioners don't actually want to circumvent coinjoin censorship, they just want to harm the reputation of open source software.
Lol. As if there are no
other solutions proposed? Just because we don't run our own Wasabi coordinators, it doesn't mean we don't recommend other privacy options.