But as casino side, They view this as unprofitable and abused to their promotion that’s why they ban such user after withdrawing the funds. Not all user in the casino is doing this so they just banning someone that doing it instead of updating the ToS just for the sake of controlling minimal number of user that doing this thing.
Remember, that there’s no money loss here. The OP got his money including the reward. I wonder how can he be mad and accuse a casino scam after he got his 100% balance.
No money loss, is not the point to justify a wrong or a trap to use it as a bait for players to ban their account. I don't know if the OP is mad or not, how strong his feeling about it. But what I am saying is it's a good excuse for Rollbit to use this shady promo and banning many accounts.
I agree with this. And I'm not talking about this specific case because I can't know for sure if this is actually the reason that caused the player to be banned or if there is something else that we don't know about. But generally, if a casino allows betting at certain odds or certain methods to clear bonuses and meet wagering requirements, then they can't use that as an excuse to restrict players. This should be defined in the bonus terms, or even better, regulated by software on the platform itself so that the player cannot even use such methods accidentally. If a player has not broken any defined rules, then they have no basis for restricting him, regardless of his betting patterns. I'm just illustrating here, but if, for example, they have a x5 wagering requirement to clear the bonus amount, then they can't limit a player because they haven't wagered their amount 50 times. Likewise, if they haven't defined what odds are required, then they shouldn't limit the player just because he bet 1.01x, not 1.5x or 2x. Such practices of restricting players without a valid reason are considered discriminatory and are even illegal in some jurisdictions, regardless of what is stated in their Terms of Service.