Re: Petition to remove Wasabi from recommendations of bitcoin.org
Why would you participate in a petition to have open source privacy software removed from Bitcointalk since you can solve any problems of arbitrary censorship by running your own coordinator?
Three things.1. Your open-source software with its default settings working with the default coordinator isn't privacy software.
2. This petition concerns a request to have Wasabi removed from bitcoin.org, not Bitcointalk.
3. If you paid more attention to my previous posts instead of coming up with innovative ways to dodge questions, you would notice that I am not for removing the privacy-invasive Wasabi wallet from bitcoin.org. But I am for lowering its privacy ratings as I mentioned earlier. And since you are going to say that the code is open-source and I can run my own coordinator, I am still for lowering the wallet's privacy rating.
However, paying money to a chain analysis company can still be useful even when checking a single unspent addresses because even an address that is not linked to others could have been reported as a direct recipient of stolen money.
You have no way to know that. You don't know if that is true. You are a trustless entity that relies on a blackbox to tell you what is acceptable and what is not with no way of verifying the accuracy of the information. I love how discontinuing their coordinator would have set Bitcoin's privacy for decades when Bitcoin is only a decade old. 
Not only that, but Kruw keeps highligting that the software and code is open-source, so why would there be a problem for Bitcoin if zkSNACKs disappeared tomorrow? I know why I am asking this, lets see if Kruw takes the bait or dodges the question.