Why do you keep asking me rhetorical questions?
Because I want
you to say what
I already knew. In my first bait attempt, I wanted to hear that you have no idea what your blockchain analysis partners blacklist, deem unfit for coinjoining, and also that you don't care.
You, the advocates of privacy and openness care not one bit about the secrecy that the opponents of Bitcoin and your partners present to you. That part is done. Now I want to hear something else, but judging by one of your sentences in one of your previous replies, you either figured it out or you aren't going to contradict yourself.
No one at any point suggested that Bitcoin would have problems if zkSNACKs disappeared.
You did, as BlackHatCoiner showed.
The reason you refuse to accept this solution is because you would not be able to steal anyone's coins if you ran a coordinator. As you've already established from your collaborations with Chipmixer, Whirlwind.Money, and Betnomi, you understand that stealing users' coins is a crucial part of the business model that allows them to pay you such massive rates for luring new victims.
Oh, did he hit a nerve? Is that frustration and anger I am sensing? What else could be the reason that you are going back to your 'BlackHatCoiner is a thief' card?