Re: Petition to remove Wasabi from recommendations of bitcoin.org
That would be very disappointing, because they could be making a lot of Bitcoin and helping the Bitcoin economy as well as encouraging the Bitcoin community.
How would bitcoin.org accepting payments for adding wallet software in their page, improve the Bitcoin economy?But if they choose to "live off of donations" like some Indian mountain guru, instead of developing a business plan and boosting the adoption of Bitcoin, then whatever.
Why would an informative page like this be a business? What service does it provide? Also, how would them being a business boost the adoption of bitcoin?I mean they do not have to go full capitalist and accept only the highest bidders, but they could put a price tag for their advertising. All I'm saying.
Good, open-source wallets live off donations. If bidding was a thing, then the recommended wallets would be Binance, Kraken and Coinbase. But if a "tainted" UTXO passed through, then it's merely an illustration that the blockchain analysis company should set up more filters. 
You don't get it yet. Taint can be defined by any entity. I can right as well say that coinbase rewards are tainted. If I make the disclaimer that I will provide absolutely no evidence for my claim, then you can't disprove it, no matter how many chain analysis companies will argue it is or isn't tainted.