I have read almost everything in this thread, and I have the feeling that nothing is still clear to me. What seems to me to be the conclusion of the whole matter is:
- The neutral tag that Jollygood left on the Bencodie account is completely meaningless and unnecessary. It seems more like a personal note about a user, but unfortunately visible to everyone.
- Any complaints from BenCodie about this feedback or similar is also nonsense. At the time of the "drama" that Jolly is talking about, Bencodie was quite aggressive and argumentative, with serious insults to the other members. That's why I'm surprised that he complained about the neutral tag at all, while at the same time challenging the others.
- Now this thread as well, as a complaint about Bencodie's complaints regarding the neutral tag. Insanely. Jolly, if you had the need to open a special topic and write two long posts to explain your tag, maybe you should accept that it is not the most ideal way and the tag as such is completely useless to all other members.
Anyway, after several prompts from me, the OP decided to reply to my question about his disingenuous behaviour in the Whirlwind thread. After he semi-retracted with a "that is not what I said" comment rather than be humble and accept he made a mistake, I opted to leave a neutral tag
Do you really think that the fact that someone is not humble, because you think they made a mistake is a reason for any kind of tag?
I believe that you remember one discussion that you started quite aggressively, and for which it turned out that you misdirected the next scam accusations. Then I warned you where you were wrong, but you never humbly confirmed it. Later it turned out that I was right. So, is that a reason to give you a tag of any type for that?
So, you abuse the Trust system, ask for my feedback, "take it into account" and then stop trusting my judgement:
He kept the only The Sceptical Chymist on the list, I guess because of the comment above, where he didn't criticize him but Jollygood in some way.