Loyce, you are a great member to this forum and I believe that you contribute to it with the greatest efforts, probably in the forum. I believe in this so much that I ask for your feedback and direction when asked for. Your judgement for the forum and its development is exemplary....but that means that my judgement toward you is default...and if this is a reason to trust your judgement, then shouldn't everyone have you in their trusted judgement list? I know it's earned but...that would mean that you would have default trust (no pun intended). So you're not there not because I don't trust your judgement, but because I am not for default trust to a single user. TLDR: It's only for the sake of decentralization. It's not personal. I definitely don't distrust your judgement and I do trust your judgement for this forum.

With that, the only other person I would have in my judgement list with you if it weren't for the above, is TSC. I have nodded my head in agreement with TSC's judgement countless times throughout the forum. The post he made back to this thread is a good example that his judgement is better than mine. He approached the situation accurately, and fairly to both parties.

It was only TSC's expression of judgement that clearly helped clear the fog between myself and JG, hence the thread has been inactive since my post 6 days ago (until now). The drama ended basically after TSC's post, and my final post. I don't think the drama would have ended if TSC didn't post, and if I posted the exact same reply.