Does it mean that the ops did not take the time to read through the terms of service before promoting the casino, and even from the title of this thread one can easily see the point that makes the title to state no KYC.
Between we have to apply caution when dealing with the new casinos that promised some kind of services that look unrealistic and not clearly stated in their terms of service.
-snip
I answered it many times now, the casinos have to include KYC TERMS if they have a license even if they will never do KYC! Not the government, the casinos is the one who has the decision to require KYC from a User. My KYC levels are discussed with the casino teams!
What about to really update statistics on your website? Do you randomly read comments here? Am I wasting my time?
On your website we read: KYC level 0 - The site's Terms Of Service (ToS) do not mention any requirement for KYC verification. Now, double-check your website.
Justabit and
Jackbit are entitled to KYC level 0 while both of them mention requirements for KYC verification. How is that? It's simple, right? You don't even check websites that you add to your list, why should someone use that? I shouldn't be the one to correct you.
Most of the gambling sites that require both level 0 of 1 kyc always state them clearly in the terms and conditions so that they can keep the customers informed about the casino stances on kyc and what customers can expect when dealing with the site.