-snip-
I'll pull another few quotes from the court document you shared:
The final version of the internal Chainalysis study cited by Hanna Curtis in the webinar “Cryptocurrency Typologies: What You Should Know About Who’s Who on the Blockchains” which concluded that roughly 90% of the funds sent through mixers were done so for legal personal privacy reasons.
So even Chainalysis admit that the vast majority of mixer user is entirely legitimate and from regular users who just want to protect their privacy.
Q. Is it your testimony here that you really don't understand the intelligence heuristic that's involved in Chainalysis Reactor?
A. I don't know the full extent of what Chainalysis is doing for that heuristic, no, sir.
Lmfao. "Here's my evidence." "Can you explain it to us?" "No, I have no idea what any of this means. But I'm
certain it's enough to put people in jail, even though I don't understand it at all!"
In what other trial could one party say "We have evidence that the defendant is guilty, but none of you are actually allowed to see that evidence. We will however give you a document that confirms we have evidence that the defendant is guilty. Totally trust us, bro."
What a fucking sham.