Pot A leaders have built a healthy lead, and our Matchday 1 freebet winners are:
MoSala
cryptofrka
rohangSign up for rollbit and PM me your usernames, please!
Pot B: vd309 is the only user to collect over 20 points, with 6 points staked on Milan-Newcastle. That was ballsy!
The
Matchday 1 results are here. Leaderboard tab in development. Feel free to check and let us know if we made any errors.
Over 80% of users filled in the sheets without mistakes. Pretty good eh? Some comments to help us do this quicker next time:
- Some users marked matches and selected points but didn't select the "Stake" tickbox.
We still count them. This was to make our job easier, but it's ok. Try to remember next time

Remember, tickboxes and selection radio buttons can all be unselected (simply click on them again). seek3r, royse777, rohang, Omikifuse, jayce, casperBGD, Mahdirakib, goodpunt you can say thank you for points given

- Some users selected odds whether or not they staked points. No need for that (no harm done anyway).
- Some users marked matches by selecting the "Stake" tickbox but failed to choose the amount of points.
These were disqualified.
- Some users entered more than 10 points.
We count only the first 10 points. This is because we note that it can be difficult to keep track but in future if we see a significant deviation, we can choose to disqualify. entebah was a big offender here, attempting to stake over 50 points. Why, entebah, why??
The purpose of this post is ask if there be a way to ensure users can’t submit if their total points used is more the allowed, and a warning post informing them of the total used point if they didn’t use up to 10 points, that unused point are not being carried forward, so as to prevent these errors going forward, because we are very all aware of our delicate this pool can be being an odds based / risk-reward pool.
At the moment, not possible for advanced functions like calculating points in your bank -- if we switch to a more advanced form, it'll require people to create accounts and well, Google is at least semi-anon.
The fix we have is to count the first 10 points, ignoring all selections after that.