So I've got no issues with either of you, except that you might be just a tad bit overzealous in your crusade to clean up the forum (which I myself appreciate, btw). But again, I haven't looked into the details of the reason for your neutral on him, the issue with Whirlwind--but I will check it out.
Maybe you have checked it out by now. When someone says they are convinced something is a scam yet want to promote it for money and no other reason, there is a problem. Had he backed it up with another nonsensical statement stating the same, it would have been a negative tag. He reluctantly started twisting words and trying to make it that he did not mean that therefore it was a neutral tag.
I asked @LoyceV prior to this thread being made about some feedback. He gave me some, I took it into account and I had then told him I'll make adjustments in due time.
So, you abuse the Trust system, ask for my feedback, "take it into account" and then stop trusting my judgement:
Lol.
It is laughable but I am not surprised by his conduct.
--------------
The post deleted from PytagoraZ
is here. Let him make his signature quota elsewhere unless he posts something worthy of not being deleted.
It will be locked as I created it 14 days and posted three times 14 days ago and and not again till now. I basically allowed others to post their views though I did expect at least one troll appearing. Anyway, this thread can remain as a reference for the obsessive conduct by BenCodie after he received a neutral tag.
And let this thread be yet another reminder how a troll is still trying to attack me by using the Goebbels doctrine of propaganda: "If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it". Pathetic but not entirely unexpected conduct by BitcoinGirl.Club again.