Re: The End? Poll: Reopen the thread about BenCodie's obsessive conduct
It includes accusations toward myself in the first part of the post, then BitcoinGirl.Club later in the post...It also describes the 4 responses linked above as "trolling" when no one, aside from PytagoraZ (who deleted their post) was trolling, afaik.
There are unaddressed issues in this thread, there is no closure except the one of that JollyGood provided, with several members muted. Is this really an okay forum practice? Create issues, then mute discussion about them when things start going in a direction that you do not like?
There are unaddressed issues in this thread, there is no closure except the one of that JollyGood provided, with several members muted. Is this really an okay forum practice? Create issues, then mute discussion about them when things start going in a direction that you do not like?
He can do with his threads whatever he wants, just as you have opened one now to talk about the subject.
That's an interesting opinion to which I won't respond to. You are technically right, that doesn't mean you are entirely right as this process can definitely ripple effect into other issues quickly.
Censorship is not something to be as lightly as you are taking it. If one can, more can, and then it's a very large problem. Accountability is important if we are allowing people to end discussions whenever they want, especially in sensitive topics regarding reputation.
Is it a separate incident requiring a separate thread?
No, because it is the same problem - the OP is trying to censor further conversation to prevent further damage to their reputation.
No, because it is the same problem - the OP is trying to censor further conversation to prevent further damage to their reputation.
It doesn't matter, you can continue the debate here as you are doing.
You remind me of a thread recently opened by my recently reconciled friend. You're not going to get far with this no matter how many walls of text you write. Well, maybe you'll get JG to come around and respond with even longer walls of text.
[/quote]
I'm pretty much done posting information. Responding requires as many words as it takes. Or, I won't. If JollyGood can stop discussions when he feels like it, I'll reply when I feel like it. I've stated the problem, I would mostly like to leave it to the community from this point onward, if anyone has anything to say about it. If not, great! We can leave it at this
(I doubt that this will be the case, as, once again, censorship is a serious issue).