Locking a thread isn't censoring; it's just giving a signal that the OP no longer wants to keep the debate going. Know what I mean?
If you read the posts leading up to the thread lock, users were addressing flaws in JG. He locked the thread because the thread had the potential of circling to hurt his own reputation.
That's exactly what the Chymist meant, you don't need to say it loud LOL
Pathetic but not entirely unexpected conduct by BitcoinGirl.Club again.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5466079.msg62886644#msg62886644It was interesting response for
the observation I had on his thread. I did not expect anything better from him. In fact it proves the point I wanted to make.
Anyway, fuck everything. I couldn't wait to reply @examplens when I read your post earlier LOL
So we can expect Jollygood's tag on Satoshi's feedback page. Something like "BEWARE: This user cannot be trusted. Satoshi created Bitcoin, and after that, he left the forum leaving many questions unanswered. I will revise this feedback if he comes again and provides some answers."
I don't understand why did not he done it any yet?
Do you think it's a double standard from JollyGood 😂? Feel free to leave your opinion about it 😂
Or should we still start a request from theymos to open a new board next to Reputation "JollyGood's tags - Revisions and appeals"
You are asking theymos to give him some especial privilege.
Please don't even think about it, if such privilege is given to him, he will become more careless and start to feel that he is The One Above All [reminds me CH LOL].
Following your imagination, I think he will then tag theymos's feedback page with something like, "
BEWARE: This user cannot be trusted. Theymos collected bitcoin to launch the forum software, and after even a decade, there are no new forum software. It raises may questions and all are unanswered. I will revise this feedback if he give some explanations and launch the software."