c. if you actually research things like regulations and laws and rules. you learn the loopholes and exceptions to evade their crap.. its how i dont need to worry. because i actually do research. i dont just fear the unknown
Why do these loopholes exist? They are for rich people to don't pay taxes and earn as much as possible while your average worker joe will get fucked if doesn't pay it. Offshores, loopholes and so on were created for elites and you tell me that it's better to give these elites even more control on us?
[/qoute]
rules are not made just fr elites.. its just elites bother to educate themselves to learn the rules to find the loopholes.. you can too just by doing the research
im against government. but i dont just make up stories in my head. i research and look at what they are capable of and what they do.. most politicians care more about playing golf than what some pseudonymous bitcoin user is upto
Don't pay taxes and you'll see how they'll knock on your door soon. Or probably lose your job and when you'll be left without income, you'll see that government isn't interested in you. It's like, if you have income, you should pay me but if you don't have income, you shouldn't beg me for money, just fuck off.
first of all learn the difference between tax avoidance vs tax evasion.. it will change the results of who does or does not knock at your door
So, when there is this kind of relationship between government and people, I think it's a good reason to protect your privacy as much as you can. If it's none of their business how I survive when I'm left without a job, then it's none of their business how I spend my money. And the main reason why I don't want others to know how I spend my money is simple: I don't support big chain businesses and I don't want to improve and expand their business by making them calculate what I buy, when I buy and so on.
there is no default ongoing relationship.. again you assume you are being watched all the time.. reality is your not. however if someone makes a report against you.. then the monitoring relationship begins..
its the same with child social services. government dont watch kids all day.. but as soon as a report is made. then hell starts
also when it comes to money. for centuries money has been the control of banks/governments so laws have always been about banks/governments able to view/report/audit money.. money for centuries has never been private. auditors, taxmen, kings and government have always had rules that govern its use and seizures and control of circulation..
bitcoin is a new paradigm.. which from 2009-2013 escaped the draconian model of money as it was deemed private property.. however in 2014 it was declared by law as currency so joined the same jurisdiction of money rules.. i personally would prefer bitcoin to be privately tradable property rather than currency.. but those "mainstreamers" want it to be currency. so now you need to know the currency rules that predate bitcoin
if blackhat was really that concerned. he would have learned by now(after being told many times) that mixers are in regulators list of suspicious activity that does generate investigation reports. and so to avoid being investigated, he would try to move away from such things
As far as I understand, you are saying that if you want to stay anonymous, you have to hide that you are trying to be anonymous, right? That's where I agree with you but do transactions received from mixer look unnatural? If mixer does its job really well, then I think it's not a problem but I would lean on the side of manual coinjoin.
silly thing is.. people like blackhat not only advertise using mixers but he also shows guides of how mixers work, where it reveals the amounts the coins are split into and gives examples.. thus making it very easy for any analyst to then use his guides to then see other examples of others using it to then find the pattern.
most mixers are too obvious. and thats what oeleo and blackhat cry about.. they dont like that mixers are not just obvious. but also suspicious behavior listed and that their lax attempts of mixing get spotted so obviously. they cry that the law should not forbid suspicious activity rather then realise they should not use something so obviously lame/lazy. if something is so easily spotted as suspicious.. then your not doing your job right of being private
its like walking down a street but not wanting to be seen. but doing so by obviously and acutely jumping behind bushes and cars.. which makes people notice you more as being weird, out of place.. you know.. stupid tactics.. there are other ways to not get noticed. especially not promote that you want to hide