The OP's theory is all well and good, but it would be much better if he backed it up with proof that the trading he does gives him consistent long-term profits, but he's not going to do that. Seeing that since he wrote the OP hasn't commented here I'd be willing to bet that he doesn't even trade and it was an attempt at merit fishing.
My trading strategy requires daily trading, I do it every day. And I have a particular percentage in mind while opening orders, I use take profit orders, and I believe I know, what I want in the end of the deal. This implies I have a goal in the end of the month, the specific percentage as well. However, I also assume that in the best case only 2/3 of a month can be profitable, when everything is going like I thought. I cannot count on every day being as profitable as I want. Some of the days can be even red, I can loose not only the potential profit, but also a part of the deposit. This is why we cannot have an illusion of daily or weekly trading as exceptional profitable activity.
Would you care to elaborate? The vast majority of traders lose money but some make money. If you are one of those who win it would be interesting if you could share your experience, such as how long you have been trading, with what approximate capital, what profitability and things like that.