[quote author=Poker Player open to review of my tags, but in this case I see it difficult because it is a massive rule breaking with several alts accounts. If evidence were presented that all three of us red taggers were wrong I understand that we would delete or change the feedback. Another thing could be that over time you would continue to use the forum without breaking the rules and maybe it could be changed to neutral, or if you showed trustworthy in some way you could earn green feedbacks over the red ones.
[/quote]
You have been able to clear my doubts and i am not in any way soliciting you remove the tag. So far your reply here is clear enough but unfortunately moving on with this account is total waste of time when i have other things to attend to. I won't come here to prove to anyone i deserve their trust everyone have the right to believe whatever and act the way the choose to.
Obviously the concern you have about this is monetary. The feedbacks at the very least make it difficult to participate in paid signature campaigns and if there are many without any green ones, they make it impossible. But they are not the end of the world, I have recently seen that Royse777 has accepted Digaran, who does not have a very nice trust profile, in one of his campaigns. Surely Royse777 has weighed other reasons that outweight his profile to accept him. One thing I see is that Digaran has been posting for about 10 months without getting paid and that could be one of the reasons.
Prove to me it is not the same monetary value that has kept you on this forum all along. Let's stop this habit of painting others black just to stand out as the saint, it is uncalled for and not necessary. If Royse777 accepted Digaran in one of his campaigns it was simply a matter of choice. And it will be so funny to realise Digaran is even more reputable than most critics who parade the forum with lots of positive tags. I think it is high time the highly profiled users get policed around.