Also, why you distrust BoXXoB's judgement? His last use of trust feedback was over three years ago, and I do not see any apparent issues there. Similarly, Shishir99 hasn't even used his trust feedback, so I am curious about your reasons for distrusting them.
You know why buddy. It's because he did not like my opinion and I feel like he did the same thing with everyone for a similar reason. Agree with him? You will be included. If he does not like your opinion, he will exclude you. I don't think we should care about his inclusion or exclusion as he clearly does not understand the purpose of it. Or even if he understands, he is using it for his own purpose (to defend).
I did not even check if he distrusted me. I just checked now and I realized I was distrusted by another member for some reason. What should I do if I don't know the reason? Should I ask via PM? what if they report my PM?
That's not why either of you are in my distrust list.
Shishir99, you are in my distrust list because I don't trust your judgement, after the way you conducted yourself when you created that pointless thread which took 3 days of being on the defence until lovemyfamilis suggested you close the thread. You put me INA stressful situation, condoned other members to twist truths, therefore, I don't trust you.
As for Stalker22, I have similar reasons, not entirely the same...though to put it shortly, based on posts in that same thread and rationale shown in other topics, I don't trust their judgement either.
Obviously, you are going to disagree with me because its your judgements that I do not trust. Just like I disagree with nutildah distrusting mine. That's the way it goes though.
Holydarkness hit the nail on the head, as did many other users.
I suppose the forum or its members weren't censored, participate in the original topics were however. BetKing being due to moderators, that's fair enough (and coincidental timing)....JollyGood on the other hand, sure, he has the right to lock his thread however locking it at a time where focus was drawing over to him, that's a censoring action. Yes, we can all make new threads to continue the discussion, though we all know that no one wants to make new threads just to respond (and if we did every time, the forum would be flooded).
I think there has been sufficient discussion. I'll lock this thread in 72 hours (feel free to leave final comments in the meantime - that way, no one feels censored
)